11/10/2023 0 Comments Happy endings margaret atwood review![]() ![]() ”(Athens).Įach of the scenarios in “Happy Endings” shows how unpredictable life can be. “It contains the element of luck – we need to believe in that – and shows the weak and vegetarian, if not triumphing over the large and carnivorous, at least escaping from their clutches. There are unexpected and inconvenient aspects of life that are inevitable. The stories “A Conversation with my Father” and “Happy Endings” explains how life cannot be controlled. “What happens – funny, sad, infuriating – is that the force of story won’t be corralled any more than life itself will. The bad scenarios are the scenarios that end in death or heartache. Those are the scenarios where everything works out and there is a typical happy ending. The good scenarios are usually the scenarios that most readers like the most. Both stories have different sets of scenarios, some considered good and some bad. This shows how life can be unpredictable and irrational. The scenarios in both “A Conversation with my Father” and “Happy Endings” contain a series of unfortunate events. These scenarios involve a group of characters that goes through a series of unfortunate events.īoth “A Conversation with My Father” and “Happy Endings” describes how life can be unpredictable and irrational, gender dynamics and expectations, and how people should make their own happy endings. These two stories are similar in how they describe different scenarios that end differently. Both Grace Paley’s “A Conversation with My Father” and Margaret Atwood’s “Happy Endings” are two stories that explain the different ways that life can turn out. ![]() Most stories have happy endings while others have more realistic endings. Ultimately, the story concludes that the “what” is not nearly as important as the “How and Why.Maria Holmes Gilchrist English 102 24 November 2011 “A Conversation with My Father” and “Happy Endings” Many authors have written stories about life and their opinions of it. The various plot iterations throughout the story illustrates the ways in which the elements of a story, when broken down into discrete units, are often so interchangeable with one another as to be virtually meaningless. In scenario F, the narrator attempts to complicate things further by imagining John and Mary as spies and counterrevolutionaries, but concludes that the endings of all of the stories are all ultimately the same.Īt the end of “Happy Endings,” Atwood meditates on the nature of plot and story, arguing that plot is ultimately less interesting than other aspects of storytelling. In scenario D, Fred and Madge brave a tidal wave, while in scenario E, Fred and Madge deal with illnesses such as heart disease and cancer. At the conclusion of the story, Madge remarries to a man named Fred and everything continues as in A. When John walks in on Mary and James having sex, he kills them and commits suicide. Since James is often away, Mary also engages in a relationship with John, who in this scenario is much older and already married to Madge. In scenario C, Mary is in love with James, an independent and adventurous young man with a motorcycle and record collection. John marries Madge and everything continues as in A. When Mary finds out that John is seeing another woman, Madge, she commits suicide. ![]() While Mary attempts to woo him with carefully prepared meals, her impeccable appearance, and sex, John remains unsatisfied and treats her poorly. ![]() In scenario B, Mary falls in love and attempts to pursue a romantic relationship with John, who is noncommittal and uninterested. In scenario A, John and Mary marry, buy a house, have children, and generally achieve a “happy ending.” What happens next?” The story then proceeds through various plot iterations, describing different ways in which the tale might end. Atwood begins the story with a simple setup: “John and Mary meet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |